| Welcome! | English (US)  |
| Welcome! | English (US) |
Thinking about going 
? Votes are doubled for Pro users; each vote adds +2 or -2.
Have a new idea?
 | stormlifter says: In the blog post: http://blog.rememberthemilk.com/2008/05/guest-post-advanced-gtd-with-remember.html
Posted at 8:53pm on June 17, 2008 |
 | |||
|
| martin.capote says: +1 Posted 4 years ago |
| rushy2uk says: This is a great idea! +1
Posted 4 years ago |
| jacksdl says: Yep. That would be a good feature. Posted 1 year ago |
| serodmat says: In my experience: your GTD system is YOUR GTD. It depends on you needs. E.g., it is worth it maintaining a link between projects and actions? It depends on you kind of work, life, ... Posted 1 year ago |
| tismey says: I feel like someone could revisit that GTD post and rework it. It's _an_ implementation, and one that I used for a while, but some of it is too fiddly. For example, using separate lists per project is fine, but becomes unwieldy pretty quickly with the current RTM UI. I found I wasn't really setting up proper GTD projects because of the friction involved in setting up a new list. Posted 1 year ago |
 | sokmonkey67 says: Adding a subtasks feature, as has already been recommended, would help prevent tabs and the UI from going out of control...but regarding this feature request, IMO, GTD in the context of an RTM implementation is really a set of best practices to guide the configuration and use of RTM... Posted 1 year ago |
 | henrikba says: Agree with other posters; I have a very specific GTD implementation in RTM, but it's not said that would work for anyone. Forcing you into an implementation that might be too overkill (eg; link projects and next actions, relying solely on smart filters etc etc) is not a desired outcome. I'm all for posts on different GTD setups, but don't think it makes sense to dictate one. Posted 1 year ago |
