| Welcome! | English (US)  |
| Welcome! | English (US) |
Thinking about going 
? Votes are doubled for Pro users; each vote adds +2 or -2.
Have a new idea?
 | sarah.mount says: This is a it crazy, but I think it could be hugely useful and maybe quite popular with GTDers...
Posted at 12:05pm on December 23, 2005 |
 | |||
|
 | Answeredemily (Remember The Milk) says: Cool, I've never heard of having tasks in a matrix -- I'll have to check it out. Not sure how feasible having a quadrant may be, but we are looking into additional views that we can provide, so we'll keep it in mind. Posted 7 years ago |
 | calebegg says: Brilliant, great idea! Posted 7 years ago |
| sarah.mount says: Well, i reckon it shouldn't be too hard...you can use CSS floats to make a 2x2 matrix (or just place them in a list, it doesn't really have to *look* like quadrants, though it would be nice). The rest should just be a little bit of scripting...if the APIs were public yet I'd be tempted to have a go myself :) Posted 7 years ago |
| oliver.kershaw says: Absolutely! My dad taught me this system in, oooh, 1994? And it's served me very well since (when I've remembered to use it). Posted 1 year ago |
| peter.wolk says: Priorities can be used that way. Or tags #urgent #important ... and then create four smartlists. What would the advantage of seeing those four lists simultaneously on screen be? Posted 1 year ago |
 | waldir.leoncio says: I used to work with that matrix, until the day that I realized it was silly to even care about tasks that are not important or urgent, so that quadrant was always blank for me. Now, if you agree with me that three quadrants are enough, maybe you can use RTM's priority codes to work around this issue. Posted 1 year ago |
