Forums / Ideas

This sat here for a while without generating any interest. But the way I use RTM I would find this quite useful too.

I have set up smart lists called 15, 30, 60 that give me things that are 15 or less, 30 or less, 60 or less. So based on available time I can choose tasks wisely, but rather than setting up more smart lists with ranges it would be nice to have them sorted in those lists so if I have an hour available, I can look at one list and chose to knock out 5 or 6 little tasks, or get done one big task.

Posted 5 years ago

rajjan

A nice search keyword would be sortBy: where you could add for example timeEstimate, priority, dueDate, tag (difficult as a task can have many tags), etc.

Would make the smart lists even smarter!

Posted 5 years ago

ranbarton

Implementing sort as part of SmartList has a lot of potential. I would hope that when power-sorting finally appears in RTM (when, not if, he says hopefully), that it will support specifying multiple criteria for the sorting [sort by due date, then priority, then by time estimate (ascending)] for example.

Posted 5 years ago

+1 to sort by time estimate on all lists.

This seems like a useful, standard feature and reasonable request. It's a little unlikely to expect the average user to create a smart list just to be able to sort by estimate.

I'd also request that there be an option to display time estimate directly on a task w/o having to mouse over the task.

Posted 4 years ago

Another vote for sorting by time estimate. And a total. That way I can see if my tasks for a given day are exceeding the number of hours in the day!
This is actually important, as then I know that I need to start moving tasks around.

Posted 4 years ago

i agree sorting by time estimate would be a nice feature.

+1

Posted 4 years ago

ranbarton

For all sorts of links to years' of great sorting suggestions and ideas, see this thread:
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/6289/

Posted 4 years ago

+1 would love to see the time estimate in the task list.

It's satisfying to see the sum of all the time estimates against each list and (sometimes!) get it to slowly decrease. The only problem is you have to remember to assign a time estimate to every task, and it's hard work to check if there are any tasks without associated times, as you have to hover over every single one.

Posted 4 years ago

andy.raffle

Susan,

I have a smart list ("fix") with this query:

isTagged:false OR (NOT timeEstimate:"> 0")

It shows any tasks which have no tag or no time estimate. You can easily expand it to show tasks with no location or due date if those are also important to you.

Posted 4 years ago

Thanks, that gets round things. Now I've got a smart list has search criteria:

list:Work AND NOT timeEstimate:"> 0"

Posted 4 years ago

this doesnt necessarily sort them, but from here I add tags to the results

due:today (timeEstimate:"> 0") AND (timeEstimate:"< 10min")
due:today AND (timeEstimate:"> 10min") AND (timeEstimate:"< 20min")
due:today (timeEstimate:"> 25min") AND (timeEstimate:"< 45min")
due:today (timeEstimate:"> 45min") AND (timeEstimate:"< 1hr")
due:today (timeEstimate:"> 1hr") AND (timeEstimate:"< 2hr")
due:today (timeEstimate:"> 2hr") AND (timeEstimate:"< 3hr")
due:today (timeEstimate:"> 3hr") AND (timeEstimate:"< 4hr")
due:today (timeEstimate:"> 4hr") AND (timeEstimate:"< 5hr")


Since when I am at work it may vary if I have 5 minutes, 10, 30, 45 minutes free to do something, or things may change I use this to make it work as a makeshift smart list

Posted 4 years ago

I concur. But I think it would be immensely useful to take it a little further and have RTM provide "optimized" suggestions for how to spend a user-specified block of time. For example, if I tell RTM I've got 30 minutes, it should give me a 2 or 3 options for how to use that time (e.g., 10 minute tasks or 1 30 minute task) based on criteria like: priority, elapsed time since todo entered and possibly number of times postponed.

Posted 4 years ago

I'd dig this feature!!

Posted 4 years ago

krissy

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll check and see if it's on the list already - if not, I will add it now.

Posted 4 years ago

bamiller

I would love to have the time estimate shown in the list and be able to sort by time. Not having the time estimate is one of the reasons I'm still looking for for different task management options.

Posted 4 years ago

I'm looking at this again - 1 year into my GTD implementation and I notice a lot of my tasks are getting buried because I don't have any graphical way of displaying or sorting on the time estimates.

Estimated time seems still very much a second (or perhaps even third) class citizen in RTM - is anything planned to promote it forward ? Even something as simple as when I select multiple tasks, it shows me the total time estimates of them (helping me plan which tasks I am going to focus on that day / hour / evening).

I see various hot topics on swimlanes, time taken and other reporting metrics, but these all seem unlikely to happen with time estimate as it is.

Posted 4 years ago

lukewarming

One more vote to get sorting by time and sum of total time going!

Posted 4 years ago

ranbarton

Sorting, as it exists, was not originally part of RTM. It was added on 8/1/07, and those three sort options (priority, date, alphabetical) are much better than nothing, but...

These boards are littered with threads by people suggesting different sorting schemes. A very non-comprehensive list follows, including several that ask for just what you desire...

http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/279/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/552/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/783/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/1448/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/1547/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/1891/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/1910/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/2243/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/2514/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/2854/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/2856/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/2879/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3145/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3158/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3206/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3233/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3742/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3835/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/3989/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/help/4043/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/4472/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/5062/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/6289/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/6368/
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/7226/

So when you hear cranky ol' timers lament that the UI of the RTM site has lain dormant while other things have been attended to - GMail, iPhone, &c. - this is exactly the sort of thing we're talking about. I really hope some basic things, like per-list, multi-variate, customizable sorting, are addressed before Bob turns his attention to Outlook syncing, for example.

* The idea that smartlists have access to an operator that would specify sorting is one of the many great ideas found in the threads above. I think that would help make RTM's best feature even better.

Posted 4 years ago

sortBy would be a great addition to smart lists

Posted 4 years ago

bebob

Another vote for sorting by time estimate and displaying it next to the task.

Posted 4 years ago

Oddly enough, when I put "sort by time estimate" in the search field, I got no results. I only found this thread by looking for sort.

Another vote for wanting to more easily sort by time estimate!

Posted 3 years ago

+1 for displaying time estimates next to tasks and for sorting by time estimates

Posted 3 years ago

I would like to see power-sorting and or sorting by time too.

Posted 3 years ago

+1 for sorting!!! PLEASE add!

Posted 3 years ago

+1

Posted 3 years ago

garzalivas

I ALSO WOULD LOVE SORTING BY TIME ESTIMATE, OR EVEN SMARTLIST WITH SORTING CRITERIA.

1+

Posted 3 years ago

mufftin

+5

Posted 3 years ago

I agree that time estimates should be:
1) visible in the list
2) available as a sorting parameter.

As for its visibility I would appreciate an option to display it not as a number but as a graphic - for example, 8 different shades of gray in a bar on the right (similar to the colored priority indication on the left) . This would make it much easier to see the overall picture quickly while still being accurate enough, at least for my needs. My own time estimates are usually not very exact anyway, so there is no need to get lost in the exact numbers, especially if they blur the picture.

Actually, in my opinion, it would be better and simpler if not just the display mechanism, but also the very entry of time estimates, was available as a (hot-keyable?) "time class" in say, 8 levels. Then it would be possible for me (each user) to to have my (his) own definition, say, "time requerement: 3".

The only thing in RTM that is more important to me than this would be to have more priority levels available - 4 is not enough for my needs. Either simply have more levels (like 1-8 or 1-16, all with differnt colors etc, or, probably much better, something like an a, b (,c,d) sublevel grading of each priority level, with uniform grapical markers of the sublevel (say, a bullet of different sizes in the colored priority bar).

Posted 3 years ago

I sure would love to have the time estimate more viewable (like tags). Right now it still takes some effort to see if I've overscheduled my tasks for the day or not. And it would also be helpful to see how much time I actually did spend on a task vs. my estimate...

Posted 2 years ago

+1

Posted 2 years ago

gordon.bazeley

+1

Posted 2 years ago

+1 to enable sorting by estimated duration.

Also, multi-criteria search is essential to accommodate the needs of many users. The current single-criteria sorting feature is severely limited, in my opinion.

Posted 2 years ago

jlam

+1 for sorting by time estimate . What order though? hmmmm......

I'd start with smallest estimate at the top, followed by progressively longer tasks, then those with no estimate set.

Posted 2 years ago

mcgumbel

+1 for sorting by time estimate.

I would really appreciate that feature.

Posted 2 years ago

mburchrtm

I would love to see a total time estimate for tasks due today to prevent overscheduling.

Posted 2 years ago

dbenamy

+1

This might be a make or break feature for me upgrading to pro.

Posted 2 years ago

majoc

+1 for sorting by time estimate.

Posted 2 years ago

syk3

I searched for this feature just to do a +1. Smartlist sorting criteria was something I didn't think about but would love.

Posted 1 year ago

pfandtasse

Three years going strong for sorting. +1. Never lose hope.

Posted 1 year ago

Looking forward to this feature!

Posted 1 year ago

+1!!

Posted 1 year ago

+1

Posted 1 year ago

+1

Posted 1 year ago

tamra

+1

Posted 1 year ago

chasprebil

+1

Posted 1 year ago

Easy to implement, so why the wait?

Posted 1 year ago

jerzy.paprocki

+1

Posted 4 months ago

andrey.klimov

+1

Posted 15 weeks ago

meagan.nichols

+1

Posted 14 weeks ago

mwld

I want this +1!

Posted 6 weeks ago