| Welcome! | English (US) ![]() |
| Welcome! | English (US) ![]() |
Have a new idea?
| didaio says: Hello!
Posted at 9:12pm on September 3, 2007 |
| bzpilman says: One great different way of doing start dates. I like it. Posted 4 years ago |
JohnFoland says:Yeah, personally, I like it better than start dates because it would fit seamlessly in the current interface and makes total logical sense. Posted 4 years ago |
| bzpilman says: It would, really.
Posted 4 years ago |
| carib says: why not just treat the due date as the start date? Problem solved-no need for Bob to start coding. Posted 4 years ago |
| didaio says: rajjan, i completely agree with bzpilman.
Posted 4 years ago |
JohnFoland says:I'm still a big fan of this approach to start dates. It's perfect in my book. Posted 4 years ago |
| bzpilman says: I also still think this is the perfect solution. Just perfect. Posted 4 years ago |
| lazallen says: i think bzpilman's approach is very neat. currently use the due date as a way to hide the task until I want to see it again, and then remove or replace the due date once it appears on it's first due date.
Posted 4 years ago |
| alysson says: I also have items that I have to complete withing a date range that I would like to see it throughout that time and mark it done when it is truly done. I have been using the start date as the due date then marking it done when it gets completed. However, it gets nerve-racking to constantly stare at an overdue item (that's not really overdue!). Posted 3 years ago |
rajjan ![]() says:Check this workaround using tags and smart lists, presently at the end of the thread: www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/tips/590/
Posted 3 years ago |