| Welcome! | English (US) ![]() |
| Welcome! | English (US) ![]() |
Have a new idea?
| shawny says: I haven't been able to find any previous discussion on this, so hopefully it's not redundant.
Posted at 5:53pm on March 20, 2007 |
| emily (Remember The Milk) says: Sorry, wildcard searching isn't currently possible with the search feature. Posted 6 years ago |
matthewartz14 says:Bummer. I was hoping for the same thing.
Posted 6 years ago |
matthewartz14 says:Another though if wildcard is difficult. You have noteContains as a search operator. Possibly create a tagContains search operator? Posted 6 years ago |
| toporkov says: put me down this feature, possibly for making a list with all tasks that don't have a @* tag assigned to them, for contexts Posted 6 years ago |
| janis.janums says: tagContains would be great. Or simple wildcat could do the same. Posted 6 years ago |
| brettlytle says: Me too. I'd love that feature... Posted 5 years ago |
| whibs says: Gets my vote! Posted 5 years ago |
| curoi says: Another vote! Posted 5 years ago |
| nazley says: and another vote here Posted 5 years ago |
| sejjiin says: tagContains or wildcard would make RTM much more flexible by specifiying your own tag-types e.g. everything with a @ is a context, etc. Strangely, notes do have this feature; I'm tempted to move tags over to notes. Posted 5 years ago |
| kempcb says: another vote!
Posted 5 years ago |
| mgrassotti says: Agree with sejjiin's post - tagContains would make it a lot easier to implement GTD using RTM. Without this feature it's a bit of a challenge. Posted 5 years ago |
| ithacanz says: Another vote for tagContains, but I think the more general solution would be (basic) regex for any search operator - then you can also force it to look at the start of the tag rather than the @ symbol appearing anywhere in the tag (unlikely in this case, but maybe not in other uses). This is the one feature that's getting in my way for easily using RTM for GTD. Posted 5 years ago |
| westis says: Another vote for wildcard or tagContains! Any news on if this is planned to be implemented? Posted 5 years ago |
| johnfoland says: I would like to cast my vote for this feature, too! Thanks RTM! Posted 5 years ago |
| ngeballe says: I'd love to have that feature too, thanks
Posted 5 years ago |
| johnfoland says: Could be a sweet Pro feature! :-D Posted 5 years ago |
| leifg says: Another vote for "tagContains" or regular expressions
Posted 5 years ago |
| richie_p says: Another vote for the wildcard/regular expression version of this suggestion! Seems very strange in this day and age to encounter a search that doesn't allow for a good ol' asterisk. Posted 5 years ago |
| tsolignani says: My vote for it. Thank you. Posted 5 years ago |
| vjcamarena says: Hey all! I'd like to suggest a workaround.
Posted 4 years ago |
| dcgm says: My vote for it. Thank you. Posted 4 years ago |
| markrichards says: tagContains vote. Posted 4 years ago |
| geojono says: another vote Posted 4 years ago |
rajjan ![]() says:Interestingly, we have tagContains since almost two years ;-)
Posted 4 years ago |
| steve.whitney says: I'd sure appreciate a way to user regular expressions.
Posted 3 years ago |
| sakal77 says: I would like use wildcards on locations. I have many locations like DTTown1, DTTown2, SKTown1, SKTown2, etc.
Posted 3 years ago |
| andrewski (Remember The Milk) says: sakal77,
Posted 3 years ago |
| roebot says: I'd like wildcard search too.
Posted 3 years ago |
| erik.moore says: Another vote for wildcard searching, and short of that, at the very least could we have right-hand truncation? I.e., if I have Lists called "wk-Project1," "wk-Project2," "wk-Project3," etc., then right-hand truncation would allow me to search:
Posted 3 years ago |
| champops says: erik, you can already search for tagContains:wk-
Posted 3 years ago |
| bryan.osborn says: I'm very surprised to discover I can't use wildcards, even in pro! I need the equivalent of a "listContains" search. Posted 2 years ago |
wrayre says:Sort of silly to have that nice post of GTD with RTM and then not have a listContains to enable grouping of tasks by "wk" or "ps". Posted 2 years ago |
| mvonrose says: +1 Can we get this feature soon? listContains would be so very very helpful Posted 2 years ago |
| growdigital says: +1 listContains, as I'm using GTD w. RTM! Posted 2 years ago |
| sig_ma says: I have lots of personal and work lists (prefixed ps_ and wk_, respectively). I want to say (priority:1 and listContains:wk_) to get my high priority work items. Instead I have to name all my work lists individually, which is impractical as I add more of them, and they change over time. Is this in the works, or what? Posted 2 years ago |
| sarahch says: +1 for listContains! Posted 2 years ago |
| akunert says: +1 for listContains! Posted 2 years ago |
| nzadri says: + 1 for listContains ! Posted 2 years ago |
| akrde says: I would like to have a listContains too, nice idea! Posted 2 years ago |
| vaclav.dobsicek says: +1 for listContains Posted 2 years ago |
| tanguyg says: +1 listContains Posted 1 year ago |