| Welcome! | English (US)  |
| Welcome! | English (US) |
 | mddperkins  says:It appears that the priority for a repeated occurrence of a task is lost if one enters a repeat type of "after". The repeat type of "every" seems to retain the task priority for each new occurrence. Posted at 12:16am on November 10, 2005 |
 | emily (Remember The Milk) says: Thanks for the report - we'll check into that. Posted 7 years ago |
| mddperkins says: Has this been confirmed as a bug? Posted 7 years ago |
| emily (Remember The Milk) says: Not exactly a bug, as it was designed like that. But keeping the priority of the previous task does make sense, so we're going to change how it works. Posted 7 years ago |
| emily (Remember The Milk) says: Now changed -- regenerated "after" tasks will have the priority of the previous task (but you can change the priority without affecting previous repeated tasks). Posted 7 years ago |
| mddperkins says: Great! This is much better. Posted 7 years ago |
