Welcome!  English (US) Language Switcher

Free-from entry textbar

bkudria says:

I just signed up with 30boxes, a new calnedar service with an interesting twist. they have a text box where I can type "Lunch tuesday with fred from 1-1:30pm", and it automatically creates it. I think something like this would be an awesome addition to RTM.

Currently, when I want to add multiple tasks to my list, I click the "Add Task" link, fill in the title, and hit enter. Only then can I set the due date, tags, priority, etc. If I want to add another task, I go through the whole thijng again, except I must remember to uncheck the perviously added task.

If RTM added a free-from entry box (even multiple lines!), I could type "write english paper, due: feb 16, tagged: school english, priority: 1", then It would be much easier, and there would be non need to default to having the task selected, since I can enter all the details in on go. If the input box was a textarea, you could require that "due:", tagged:", and "priority:" were all on their own lines, and it would be easier to parse.

The Add Task button could be like the search button, and create a pop/up/square on the screen with the text-area box...or multiple input boxes...

I'm beginning to think it is faster for me to email in a task instead of creating it in the web interface, but if you created a similar interface on the website, it would be much faster and better for users who don't want to use email...like me.

What do you think?

Posted at 5:41pm on February 8, 2006

ranbarton Pro says:

Back on 10/25, I requested something much like this in thread http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/211/

I think it would speed up data entry a great deal if RTM woudl parse the text you typed in. For whatever reason, I have never grown very comfortabke with the keyboard shortcuts, so they've never been of much help to me as time savers.

Ran

Posted at 8:13pm on February 8, 2006

emily (Remember The Milk) says:

We considered this when we started development, but having everything in one text box tends to make a nightmare for parsing (and introduces the possibility for a lot of errors).

We'd need to introduce a syntax to separate names of fields from their values (e.g. "due: today"), but if it was on one line then it would restrict the use of the ":" character anywhere else (e.g. task names).

So, the only way to parse it properly would be as bkudria suggested -- having a multiple line input (and parsing it like we parse emails).

I'm not sure how many people would find it convenient to have to type the email syntax -- it doesn't seem like it would be faster than using the keyboard shortcuts (particularly as you'd exchange learning the shortcuts for learning the correct syntax :)

We'd love to hear feedback on this though.

Posted at 4:54am on February 9, 2006

bkudria says:

Ok, simple. Instead of having a single text area, just have 4 (name, tags, due, priority) text boxes with labels, and then I can just tab between them...no parsing needed. Of course, pasing would be cool, but I realize it is not trivila to implement. Having different labeled input boxes, seems to me, is.

ranbarton, thans for pointing out that thread...don't know how I missed it!

Posted at 5:33pm on February 9, 2006

emily (Remember The Milk) says:

Tabbing between fields in the task details makes a lot of sense -- we'll see if we can add in that shortcut.

Posted at 3:56pm on February 10, 2006

bkudria says:

Great, glad to hear that. all these little thing can make RTM so much more useful and east to use!

Can I tack on another small request/complaint? Sorry for not starting a new thread!

I don't really use notes, since they are harder to get to...so recently, for example, I put the number to my dentist in the task title...but, when I edit the title of the task, the long title is squeezed into this small one-line input box. Can RTM please please change this into a multi-line textarea? It would make edting long task title a whole lot easier!

Thoughts?

Posted at 12:42am on February 11, 2006

Log in to post a reply.