| Velkommen! | Norsk (Bokmål) ![]() |
| Velkommen! | Norsk (Bokmål) ![]() |
Have a new idea?
| danielpataki says: I've seem this in the forums, but the big thread has been closed due to lack of responses. I want to start this again, maybe if enough people cast their vote the awesome people developing RTM will consider it.
Posted at 4:28pm on November 28, 2007 |
| tobor0 says: I absolutely agree that this feature is required. Posted 5 years ago |
| dberglind says: I am new here and have searched and see that this has been requested numerous times, but I too need to add my support to this idea.
Posted 5 years ago |
| nash.ogden says: Absolutely a must have. Posted 5 years ago |
| deterb says: You can grab a url for a smart list by going to the atom feed and changing the word 'atom' to 'home' in the url, but being able to automate this would be helpful. Posted 5 years ago |
| bostont66 says: This would be a great feature that I would love to have also Posted 5 years ago |
dessner says:I think it is so important, I would pay for a pro account for this feature Posted 5 years ago |
| mburer says: I also think this is a great idea. Essentially I have projects within projects, so I need lists within lists. Posted 5 years ago |
| fransn says: Vote for this!! Posted 5 years ago |
| lefnire says: gotta say, much needed. I'm moving to MindMeister until RTM has sublists. Posted 5 years ago |
| bzpilman says: When thinking smart(lists), sublists make a lot of sense
Posted 5 years ago |
| derek.conjar says: I have a tag cloud like Rajjan, but I'm still getting it all pimped out. I also use RTM Enhanced to reformat RTM so it's easier to use, and I use another script to keep the task cloud in view at all times.
Posted 5 years ago |
| crace says: I would love to have sub-lists. Yeah, it's possible to use all sorts of crazy tasks and smart lists to do this, but when it comes down to it, sub-lists would just be easier!
Posted 5 years ago |
| teresa.amar says: +1
Posted 5 years ago |
| dustinaskins says: Another vote for this feature. I loved Todoist's nesting. I've tried multiple lists using RTM but I hate how rows of list tabs stack. If Im going to have tabs stack I'd rather have parent list tabs on top and sub list tabs on bottom.
Posted 4 years ago |
| pijnappel says: +1! Posted 4 years ago |
| bdeitric says: +1 Posted 4 years ago |
| joseph.gruber says: ++++ Posted 4 years ago |
| navigator_x2 says: 100% agree this is needed... if it wasn't for the increased google integration I'd stick with Todoist as I prefer the sub task design. If the integration increases I'm switching back. Keep the masses happy and sort this out. Posted 4 years ago |
| nir.ofry says: I really need this feature. I think it is the base of the "next action" idea (of GTD) Posted 4 years ago |
| andrewmin says: +1 for the idea. Posted 4 years ago |
| charliebeldon says: +1
Posted 4 years ago |
| john.hollier says: As a consultant with mulitiple clients and often multiple projects for a single client I could definitely use this feature to keep the projects as sublists under a main client list - and if it was only available as a Pro feature I would upgrade. Posted 4 years ago |
| rolandgiesler says: I agree with this being a need that should be implimented as a high priority. Posted 4 years ago |
| dsunderhaft says: Would love to see this feature as well! Posted 4 years ago |
| stega says: +1 Posted 4 years ago |
| flanakin says: -1... Personally, I prefer tags. If this could be implemented without sacrificing simplicity, then that's one thing, but I would rather just not see it at all. Posted 4 years ago |
| jkissoon says: now that google tasks (otherwise inferior to RTM) comes with nested tasks RTM really need to take this request seriously. This could be a make or break feature. Please RTM reconsider! Posted 4 years ago |
| fish_guts says: Absolutely needed -_-
Posted 4 years ago |
| dan.julian says: I'm adding my +1. Is there a good reason this can't be added? If so, I'll stop asking or adding my +1 to these. Posted 4 years ago |
| jeff.rhine says: dan.julian,
Posted 4 years ago |
william.mackintosh says:I am really impressed by RTM. However, the lack of sublists is a great shame. Posted 4 years ago |
| rtakes says: Sublists would be great Posted 3 years ago |
| ryan.hyde says: fully agreed Posted 3 years ago |
| hmbrazil says: Agreed! Posted 3 years ago |
| marc.garcia.marti says: Hey rajjan,
Posted 3 years ago |
| smile.syban says: +1
Posted 3 years ago |
| ankue says: +100 ;) Posted 3 years ago |
| erichkist says: +100 Posted 3 years ago |
| raguza says: Absolutely needed feature Posted 3 years ago |
| margali13 says: I agree that sublists would make using RTM SOOOOO much more awesome. I use smartlists for that now, but it is certainly not ideal. But other things about RTM are so great, so hopefully if you add this it'll be simply perfect Posted 3 years ago |
| jasonwhit says: I'd like them too! Posted 2 years ago |
| vmegen says: +1! Would be an awesome feature. Posted 2 years ago |
| silverg3 says: please add sublists! :) Posted 2 years ago |
| nuvishu says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| jeff.vautin says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| tankeev says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| nicolassacre says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| mtt says: yes, please Posted 2 years ago |
| kmninbox says: I was a pro member once... but it's been over a year with some popular requests such as these, and I see no development or progress towards anything more than last years RTM. Posted 2 years ago |
| dimitor says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| gwhome says: and again a +1 +1 from a newbie. Posted 2 years ago |
| bcrem says: Hey! RTM! HOW can you not have sublists??? What, is it somehow impossible with your current design? Would you need to completely refactor the entire site? Did Bob T. Monkey have a bad experience with a sublist as a child? Posted 2 years ago |
| dgsink says: This would be awesome - lots of lists are nice, but so often I have categories that need sublists and it would be so much cleaner to be able to do this. Posted 2 years ago |
| metaloop says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| richalbin says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| jgarozzo says: +1! Posted 2 years ago |
| hanli says: Yes please! This would be so very useful. If a pro feature, I wouldn't hesitate for a second. Posted 2 years ago |
| jeffersonkg says: I absolutely agree that this feature is required. [+1] Posted 2 years ago |
| woowaabob says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| ianthevanbelzen says: +1; Posted 2 years ago |
| martin.mares says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
| chrisroppola says: + 1 . Agree as well, sublists before sub tasks. Posted 2 years ago |
| sylvain.boureliou says: +1 Posted 2 years ago |
mark.r.stoneman says:I cluster related lists by using prefixes for lists that are part of a bigger thing. Simple, and works on whatever device I'm using. Posted 1 year ago |
| heppa says: +1 Posted 1 year ago |
| anotherdamndj says: Three years of people asking for the same thing? that is crazy Posted 1 year ago |
| alejandro84 says: +1. totally required Posted 1 year ago |
| drsimcha says: IMO sublists are one of the few features missing in an othwise awesome application. Sublists would expand the ability to use RTM for a much wider variety and number of more complex tasks Posted 1 year ago |
| lucasmocellin says: +1 Posted 1 year ago |
| awww says: +1 sublists required Posted 1 year ago |
| rahathuq says: I just don't understand how sublists haven't been implemented yet. Seems like an obvious necessity. Posted 1 year ago |
bicer says:Probably the biggest missing feature in RTM. Please implement and don't make seasoned "paying" RTM users feel that they are lacking this important capability. Posted 1 year ago |
| isaacpei says: sub-list is definitely needed. maybe as step 1, just allow a first level of sub list? Posted 1 year ago |
| adzio says: yes sublists would help a lot! Please implement it! Posted 1 year ago |
| maxjmaass says: The lack of sublists is one of the things that keeps me from using RTM as my full-time Todo list application. I'll even get Premium for it, if I have to. Posted 11 months ago |
| jcollado says: This will also be very useful as an alternative to listContains search operator: Posted 10 months ago |
| kearab says: +1 pleeeeaseeee! Posted 9 months ago |
| georgedolbier says: Sublists or Sub tasks, need drag and drop orginization Posted 6 months ago |
| nadine.dyck says: +1 Posted 4 months ago |
muliady.hartono says:+1 Please allow manual ordering of list and sub-list. Posted 14 weeks ago |