Welcome!  English (US) Language Switcher

Thinking about going Pro? Votes are doubled for Pro users; each vote adds +2 or -2.

Have a new idea?

Submit a suggestion

New feature: Sorting

emily (Remember The Milk) says:

It's been a long time coming, but you can finally sort your lists (yay! :) The blog post is here.

Click the button on the top right of the list or Smart List to sort by priority, due date, or task name (the preference for each list is automatically saved, and the print view sorts the same way too).

It's a pretty basic sort for now, but we're open to ideas of other ways that people would like to customise sorting options. :)

Posted at 6:57am on August 1, 2007

Like
Dislike
zukanov says:

THANK YOU!!!!!!

While it is basic, and while it doesn't support specifying secondary (and tertiary) sorting order, not only is top-level sort by date a huge improvement IMO, but I appreciate that it seems to default to using priority as the secondary sorting field when you do sort by date.

I also appreciate that it seems to remember your sort preference per list, and across logins.

A very good start, thanks again.

Posted 4 years ago

ranbarton ProPower Poster says:

Oh happy day! I think this will be a real boon to new users, who are likely to expect a date-sort, and for other users with complex needs who can use their own keywords and the alphabetic sorts to accomplish some clever things.

Thank you!

[Like zukanov, I think about multiple sorting criteria, and I also think about sorting by other criteria (e.g., location, creation date, etc., but those are refinements.]

Please send along our thanks to the vast RTM development team.

Posted 4 years ago

beau.raines Pro says:

Emily - you guys rock!

I'm not sure if I'm going to get much done today since I'll be sorting all my lists!

This is an excellent addition to RTM.

Posted 4 years ago

tcng says:


Thanks!

I have one more request: Is it possible to sort by Task Creation Date? This is especially useful if a task does not have a due date.

Posted 4 years ago

cainmark Pro says:

Thank you! What a great feature to this already great web-app!

Posted 4 years ago

ranbarton ProPower Poster says:

Sorting by creation date would be very handy, as would by number of times postponed.

Many useful sorting suggestion in this old thread...
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/279/

Posted 4 years ago

erik Pro says:

The forum regulars will have to pick up a new "cause" now that sorting is there. Thanks! I love that it is per list/smartlist. This will add a new level of organization for us all to take advantage of.

Posted 4 years ago

eriktiki Pro says:

WOOOOO HOOOOO!

Posted 4 years ago

julian.gruber says:

A custom sorting option would be nice: Sorting by Drag & Drop.

Posted 4 years ago

holroy Pro says:

I still believe sorting according to a tag prefix would be neat. I.e set tag-prefix to be "p-" or "@" in the settings-section, and choose "tag-prefix" as sorting option, and RtM would sort the list according to the rest of the tag matching the given prefix.

Such a sorting option could be used to further extend the GTD scheme within RtM, as it could be used in the combination of a smart search on tags starting with "@ " denoting location, and then using the sort option to sort it alphabetically within the location. Or similarily with "p-" as prefix, denoting that a task tagged with "p-something" belongs to the project "something".

And this would easily allow those of us wanting to have lists in two levels.

(And to really top it of, it would be great to have the option to display a intermediate title whenever the prefixed tag changed, i.e from "p-something" to "p-tada")

Posted 4 years ago

luc0zade says:

+1 for sort by Date Added - I assume this is equivalent to Rambarton's suggestion of sorting by 'creation date'.

Thanks for adding another very useful feature!!

Posted 4 years ago

luc0zade says:

@Ranbarton - sorry for the typo on your screenname.

Thanks for pointing out the old thread, as you say it includes a several other suggestions which might now have a chance to see the light of day!

Posted 4 years ago

ranbarton ProPower Poster says:

No offense taken, luc0zade. I answer to nearly anything.

I'm often struck by how many good suggestions are in the old, dead forum threads, and I try to bring some of them back into focus now and then.

Posted 4 years ago

luc0zade says:

Hello RTM,

Best wishes for 2008.

I'm hoping that this year Bob will find the time to 'sort by date added'...

Thanks anyway for all your hard work maintaining a excellent service.

Cheers.

Posted 4 years ago

luc0zade says:

+1 year for sort by Date Added ;-)

I'm sure Bob and the others are really busy but this would be useful ... or is there a workaround which I haven't yet found?

Keep up the good work!

Posted 3 years ago

dsteele Pro says:

+1 sort by creation date

Posted 3 years ago

abandon.ramekin says:

Please add "sort by date added"!!!

Posted 3 years ago

long_ck Pro says:

I'm pulling for sort by tag. Right now, in order to do this, I have to put the "project" as the first word of the task in order to see things together in a list (search is nice, but then I'd have to search for each individual tag of my work projects - not nearly as easy or fast as running my eyes down one list). Having the tag functionality is great, but seeing tasks grouped my way is more important, so I just end up using my own "tag prefix" method instead of RTM's tag functionality.

Posted 3 years ago

bay879 says:

Forget fancy sorting, I agree with this thread, Sorting by due date doesn't properly sort day's tasks. Showing my immediate action items (and potentially overdue items) above my items with a time seems like the wrong implementation of sorting.

Posted 3 years ago

kammersgaard Pro says:

Hi

I would like to be able to sort be date created as well.

I will sign up for a pro account if it is added ;-)

Thanks, Kenneth

Posted 3 years ago

mediaarts Pro says:

+1 for sort by creation date.

This would be *extremely* useful for GTDers.

Thanks very much. :)

Posted 3 years ago

mediaarts Pro says:

The solution here, I suppose would be giving much more sort control to the user.

Is the sort functionality not handled via the client's browser? I can take a look at the massive amount of JS to verify it, but I would venture a guess that it does.

I don't know whether building multi-level sort functionality (if the user's thought process requires it) is a monumental task on the dev-end but for anyone using RTM for GTD, it seems to me that not allowing for FIFO breaks (or at least contorts) the system.

Is there any chance I could get an ETA for it?

Thanks for all your hard work. :)

Posted 3 years ago

mediaarts Pro says:

Addendum: I do recognize that GTD is functional with both FIFO and LIFO systems but I think giving the user the ability to make that decision will only make RTM a more useful product.

Posted 3 years ago

mediaarts Pro says:

Oops, I've broken rule three of the Reply Policy. Sorry. My intention is to strike up the conversation again. Sorry. (Sorry, Canadian.) Sorry.

Posted 3 years ago

alexgieg says:

How about: Sorting by hand? Drag and drop the tasks the way you want?

Posted 3 years ago

castiron says:

A sort that I'd be interested in is a date sort with most recent first. (What I really want is a way to get a list of tasks due X days before today, but the next best thing would be being able to sort my overdue list to put the most recently missed tasks on top.)

Posted 3 years ago

brettcoburn says:

I like it, but sorting by due date puts tasks that are due at specific times below tasks due at nonspecific times (which are equivalent to midnight). This seems to run contrary to expected behavior, at least for me.

Posted 2 years ago

rtmedia says:

Please enable sort by tag (s)! We really need to have a view of all tasks grouped together based on their tag (s).

Thank you...

Posted 2 years ago

maximdoucet says:

+1 for sort by tags !

It would be useful for fast reviewing of your context (which you create as "tags") in a GTD point of view.

Posted 2 years ago

joellybaby says:

Sort by date added would be really great!

Posted 2 years ago

chlobe says:

+1 for sort by tags, preferably after sorting by priority :)

Posted 2 years ago

matthew.pirocchi Pro says:

+1 for sort by tags, this would be very useful for me.

Posted 2 years ago

ulie.bardosh says:

Drug & Drop should be long ago.
It is basic for every to do list.

Posted 2 years ago

kyle.nesgood Pro says:

Sort by date added and/or Drag and Drop would really benefit those of us trying to use Mark Forster's Autofocus system!

Posted 2 years ago

rashley03 Pro says:

Any way to change the default sort for all of your lists on your account, e.g., Due Date instead of Priority?

Posted 2 years ago

bweech says:

Sometimes I forget to put a due date on a task, and it falls to the bottom of my date sorted list. How about an option to list items that are missing a date higher than a due date that is more than 3, 6 or 12 months out?

Posted 2 years ago

ranbarton ProPower Poster says:

@bweech If you build a smartlist that includes tasks with dates due within 3 months, or that have no due date, you can see just what you are after and not have future events eclipse things. Works pretty well.

Posted 2 years ago

amirmasoudabdol Pro says:

+1
Thanks

Posted 2 years ago

mattiasjlk says:

I super-ultra-second drag-and-drop sorting. Really. For me, RTM is the perfect todo app except for this nagger.

Posted 2 years ago

jbzic Pro says:

I super-ultra-mega-nth drag and drop sorting.

Definitely the ONLY "nagger" about RTM to me. Sometimes I want to sort my lists in the order I plan to do them that day, and despite attempting to work with what the current set up gives me, I can never think of a satisfactory solution besides drag and drop.

Posted 2 years ago

cpence Pro says:

Also, it would be nice if you could choose in date-sorting whether undated todo's came at the top or bottom of the list. My undated todos tend to be "sooner" rather than "later" types of tasks (and I sometimes date things YEARS into the future), so I'd like the undated ones at the top.

Posted 2 years ago

davidscottweaver Pro says:

Agreed, an undated task in my list means it can be done anytime, and the dated ones are usually specific. I'd like to see the undated tasks above the dated ones (unless ofcourse the dated task is today or past due)

Posted 2 years ago

ranbarton ProPower Poster says:

I very much desire more and better sorting, too, but… while we wait for that, you can use a smartlist to suppress items far in the future, so they don't swamp out the undated items you want to see now.

Posted 2 years ago

devenv Pro says:

Sorting by tags, with splitters or something would be nice...

Posted 2 years ago

ranbarton ProPower Poster says:

I think this sorting request should be merged with this one here (http://www.rememberthemilk.com/forums/ideas/11914/), which is (as far as I can tell) the mother of all "More sorting options, please!" thread.

Posted 5 months ago

avc76 says:

Hi all :)

I'm aware of the sorting features in RTM and you can imagine many other possibilities. But here is my question...

Why can I/we not sort a task manually ??

I just want to order the list by drag/drop a task higher or lower?
Hope this will availeble soon :)

Posted 15 weeks ago

amy.gibbs says:

+1

I'd also like undated to dos at the top of the list. the all tasks which is my default view so I can see everything i need to do is so long it flows off the bottom of my screen so I never see the undated ones.

I have many recurring tasks so despite completing them they just pop up later down the list so my list doesn't shrink much.

Posted 3 weeks ago

findmory says:

since I'm a pro and my vote is +2 i'll say PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE for manual sorting. drag and drop would be ideal.. but i'd settle for an old school move up, move down option.

Posted 3 weeks ago

markus.jung Pro says:

++ for manual sorting in the way findmory said (drag and drop or arrows).

Posted 6 days ago

anthony.hamlet Pro says:

I agree with ranbarton. Sorting by creation date would be very handy

Posted 5 days ago

Log in to post a reply.